A full-spectrum analysis of every meaningful BJJ gym directory — where we dominate, where we're exposed, and exactly what to build next.
The data depth gap is the biggest opportunity in the space. Name + address + phone is the universal standard across all competitors — and it's terrible. The first directory to show hours, pricing, and class schedules at scale owns the category.
Key finding — May 2026 analysis
| Site | Gyms | Individual Pages | UI Quality | Business Model | Threat Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MatMade.comUs — baseline | 8,485 | Yes | Modern (Next.js) | Directory + verification | — |
| gyms.jiujitsu.comJiuJitsu.com brand | 4,000+ | Thin (paywall) | Dated / phonebook | E-commerce + $59.95/yr | Medium |
| BJJMetrics.com | 3,741 | Moderate | Functional | BJJ Fanatics affiliate | Watch closely |
| JiuJitsuAuthority.com | 2,687 | None confirmed | SEO-first / thin | SEO arbitrage | Low |
| BJJChat.com | 250+ | Thin | Modern / app-like | Freemium platform | Long-term watch |
| GrappleArts.com | 0 | Directory removed | Content site | Instructional videos | None |
| IBJJF.com | N/A | Not public | Association basic | Membership fees | None |
| Dojos.com | Unknown | Basic | Web 1.0 / legacy | Multi-style legacy | None |
| Feature | MatMade | jiujitsu.com | BJJMetrics | JJAuthority | BJJChat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gym photos | Yes — free | $59.95/yr | No | No | No |
| Verified listings | Yes — human | No | No | No | Badge only |
| Google rating + review count | Missing — fix | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Instructor profiles | No | No | Names only | No | Name + belt rank |
| Affiliation filter | No | No | No | No | No |
| Style / program filter | No | No | 12 styles | No | No |
| Competition medals (Smoothcomp) | No | No | Exclusive | No | No |
| ELO ratings + fighter stats | No | No | Exclusive (deep) | No | No |
| Hours + pricing display | Partial (new fields) | No | No | No | No |
| Class booking | No | No | No | No | Exclusive |
| Training tools (journal, timer) | No | No | No | No | Exclusive |
| SEO content layer / blog | No | Basic | Minimal | Aggressive | Moderate |
| Gym count displayed publicly | No — fix this | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Exclusive = only one competitor has this feature · Partial = limited or paywalled implementation
googleRating and googleReviewCount in Strapi — just not rendering them.What they're doing: Attached to the JiuJitsu.com gear/apparel brand. The directory is an SEO asset to drive BJJ gear sales — not a genuine product. Free listings show name + address + phone only. $59.95/yr unlocks photos and enhanced details. City/state pages exist but are address-book-only with no ratings, no images, no filtering.
Their core weakness: The paywall philosophy is backward. They charge $59.95/yr for features that should be table stakes, which means gym owners who pay expect value but still get a mediocre product. These gym owners are primed to switch to us the moment they discover we offer more for free.
How to take their listings: Our gym pages need to be demonstrably richer. A MatMade listing with photos, Google rating, instructor info, and programs — all free — beats their paid listing every time. Target their gym owners directly.
What they're doing right: The IBJJF competition data is genuinely differentiated — ELO ratings, medal career histories, rival tracking, team comparisons. This is a stats platform that happens to have a gym directory. The Smoothcomp integration (medal counts per gym) is clean and useful. They've built a network effect with competitive practitioners: if you compete, you live on BJJMetrics.
Why they're the one to watch: Competition-minded practitioners are the most engaged BJJ demographic. If we don't offer competition data, that segment will always end up on BJJMetrics — even if they start their search on MatMade. We need a reason to keep them.
Their blind spot: Gym profiles are shallow. No photos, no hours, no pricing, no rich descriptions. We can be where someone goes first (discovery + trust), they go second (competition record validation). Position ourselves as complementary, then eat their user base.
What they're building: A fundamentally different product — a training management platform for BJJ practitioners. Technique library (1,000+ techniques), session journal, round timer, class booking, bracket tools, and a school directory. Their school pages show instructor name + belt rank + programs, which is already ahead of most directories. Class booking integration is a serious feature that nobody else has.
Why they matter long-term: If BJJChat grows from 250 to 2,500+ schools, their booking integration becomes a major differentiator. "Find a gym AND book your first class" in one workflow is something we don't have. They're 2–3 years from being a real threat if they execute on coverage.
Their weakness right now: 250 gyms is too small to win directory searches. Most school pages are thin on operational data. The platform requires registration for most features — creates friction for casual gym-seekers who just want an address.
What they're doing: Pure SEO arbitrage. 2,687 gyms across 774 cities — but no individual gym pages confirmed, city pages are address-lists-only with no photos, no links, no filtering. The real product is their content: technique guides, gear reviews, city-specific BJJ articles, all written for search engines.
Why they rank in some markets: Aggressive internal linking, FAQ schema on every page, long-form city guides, and high-priority sitemap weights on location pages. They're capturing "best bjj gyms in [city]" searches above us in some markets because they have a dedicated content layer and we don't.
How to beat them conclusively: Our gym data is already 3× richer. We just need a content layer to match their top-of-funnel coverage. Once we're writing "Best BJJ Gyms in Austin" with actual linked gym pages + Google ratings + photos vs. their bare numbered address list, we win every comparison — and Google will rank us higher.
Dojos.com: The "first" martial arts directory. Web 1.0 design, 40+ martial arts styles diluting the BJJ signal, no data depth. More of a historical artifact than a competitor. Zero threat.
IBJJF Registered Academies: Not a public searchable directory — just a ranking table by competition points. Valuable as a trust signal (IBJJF registration = active competition academy) but not a user-facing gym-finder. We should show IBJJF registration status on gym pages where we can verify it.
JiuJitsuSchoolFinder.com: Site is down as of May 2026. Domain may have lapsed.